[[[separator]]]
Radosław Malik
This scientific monograph is a collection of ten texts written by students of the SGH Warsaw School of Economics, participants of the fourth edition of the Young Scientist programme.
The programme aims at a scientific development of talented young people who, during their bachelor and master studies evinced scientific interests and willingness to develop competences important in research work.
The texts included in the monograph concern a variety of research topics, with the main focus on research in economics, management and finance. The complexity of the research topics
undertaken by the authors of the chapters and a number of novel perspectives on the researched themes indicate authors’ research curiosity and heralds the future scientific successes of these young researchers.
The substantive quality of the research performed by the authors of the chapters reflects the contribution of the Young Scientist programme of the SGH Warsaw School of Economics, which successfully advances students’ research competences.
The texts included in this monograph apply Systematic Literature Review (SLR) as a primary research method. A systematic literature review is an essential aspect of scientific research that provides a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence
on a particular research question and is broadly used in various fields. There are variety of benefits of SLR that have established it as a valid research method and justified its application for the purpose of this monograph.
However, among all of its advantages, clarity and reliability clearly stand out as crucial characteristics of SLR. First, systematic literature reviews are viewed as important tools to improve clarity of the previous research
as they support researchers in synthesising the findings of multiple studies and provide a coherent and explicit account of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. Thus, SLR enables researchers to identify
gaps in the literature and undertake well-informed decisions about direction of future research. Second, systematic literature reviews increase reliability of the results as they follow rigorous and transparent research procedures.
Therefore, SLR reinforces the research capacity to identify biases and limitations in individual studies, and also facilitates valid conclusions based on the available evidence.
The systematic literature reviews collected for the purpose of this monograph use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol in order to further strengthen the quality of the research
and enhance the insight into the research topics selected by the authors.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is a set of guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews that, as an analytical tool, originates from life science research
and is broadly used in e.g. medical research. The use of PRISMA provide several benefits to scientific research also in social sciences, which include improved research rigour, increased transparency and enhanced comparability.
These advantages supported the use of PRISMA in the research prepared for the purpose of this monograph.
The application of PRISMA protocol provides a structured framework for conducting SLRs, which helps to ensure that the research processes in this monograph are rigorous and standardised.
As PRISMA enforces a standardised approach to conducting and reporting SLRs, it ensures that crucial aspects of the SLR application, such as searching for studies, selecting studies, and synthesising the results, are carried out
in a consistent and streamlined manner, thus, increasing the transparency of the research process. Therefore, the application of PRISMA leads to enhanced comparability, as it allows to analyse the results of different reviews
more efficiently, which helps to build a more comprehensive and robust evidence base on a particular topic. Overall, the utilisation of the PRISMA protocol can be viewed as a good practice for
conducting systematic literature reviews also in economics as well as management and finance research as it elevates the quality of the SLR and boosts the validity of the results.
[[[separator]]]
Table of Contents
Preface
Radosław Malik
Chapter 1
Reasons for volatility of the green bond market
Agata Aftowicz
Chapter 2
Ethics and implementation of nudge policy
Wojciech Godlewski
Chapter 3
Negative effects of venture capital on startup innovation
Patryk Jóźwiak
Chapter 4
Between dynamics and equilibrium. An evolutionary perspective on firms
Jakub Konończuk
Chapter 5
Determinants of foreign direct investment acquired with Bayesian statistical techniques
Konrad Pisera
Chapter 6
Prospects of the urban housing market in Spain
Michał Reszel
Chapter 7
Inequality impact on social security. Overlapping generations models with the political dimension
Mateusz Krząkała
Chapter 8
Impact of online fantasy sports leagues on the engagement of fans
Sebastian Muraszewski
Chapter 9
Burnout and turnover of healthcare professionals in selected countries
in the COVID-19 pandemic
Dagmara Ruszkiewicz
Chapter 10
Institutional determinants of the state response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Julian Smółka
[[[separator]]]
Opis
Wstęp
Radosław Malik
This scientific monograph is a collection of ten texts written by students of the SGH Warsaw School of Economics, participants of the fourth edition of the Young Scientist programme.
The programme aims at a scientific development of talented young people who, during their bachelor and master studies evinced scientific interests and willingness to develop competences important in research work.
The texts included in the monograph concern a variety of research topics, with the main focus on research in economics, management and finance. The complexity of the research topics
undertaken by the authors of the chapters and a number of novel perspectives on the researched themes indicate authors’ research curiosity and heralds the future scientific successes of these young researchers.
The substantive quality of the research performed by the authors of the chapters reflects the contribution of the Young Scientist programme of the SGH Warsaw School of Economics, which successfully advances students’ research competences.
The texts included in this monograph apply Systematic Literature Review (SLR) as a primary research method. A systematic literature review is an essential aspect of scientific research that provides a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence
on a particular research question and is broadly used in various fields. There are variety of benefits of SLR that have established it as a valid research method and justified its application for the purpose of this monograph.
However, among all of its advantages, clarity and reliability clearly stand out as crucial characteristics of SLR. First, systematic literature reviews are viewed as important tools to improve clarity of the previous research
as they support researchers in synthesising the findings of multiple studies and provide a coherent and explicit account of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. Thus, SLR enables researchers to identify
gaps in the literature and undertake well-informed decisions about direction of future research. Second, systematic literature reviews increase reliability of the results as they follow rigorous and transparent research procedures.
Therefore, SLR reinforces the research capacity to identify biases and limitations in individual studies, and also facilitates valid conclusions based on the available evidence.
The systematic literature reviews collected for the purpose of this monograph use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol in order to further strengthen the quality of the research
and enhance the insight into the research topics selected by the authors.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is a set of guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews that, as an analytical tool, originates from life science research
and is broadly used in e.g. medical research. The use of PRISMA provide several benefits to scientific research also in social sciences, which include improved research rigour, increased transparency and enhanced comparability.
These advantages supported the use of PRISMA in the research prepared for the purpose of this monograph.
The application of PRISMA protocol provides a structured framework for conducting SLRs, which helps to ensure that the research processes in this monograph are rigorous and standardised.
As PRISMA enforces a standardised approach to conducting and reporting SLRs, it ensures that crucial aspects of the SLR application, such as searching for studies, selecting studies, and synthesising the results, are carried out
in a consistent and streamlined manner, thus, increasing the transparency of the research process. Therefore, the application of PRISMA leads to enhanced comparability, as it allows to analyse the results of different reviews
more efficiently, which helps to build a more comprehensive and robust evidence base on a particular topic. Overall, the utilisation of the PRISMA protocol can be viewed as a good practice for
conducting systematic literature reviews also in economics as well as management and finance research as it elevates the quality of the SLR and boosts the validity of the results.
Spis treści
Table of Contents
Preface
Radosław Malik
Chapter 1
Reasons for volatility of the green bond market
Agata Aftowicz
Chapter 2
Ethics and implementation of nudge policy
Wojciech Godlewski
Chapter 3
Negative effects of venture capital on startup innovation
Patryk Jóźwiak
Chapter 4
Between dynamics and equilibrium. An evolutionary perspective on firms
Jakub Konończuk
Chapter 5
Determinants of foreign direct investment acquired with Bayesian statistical techniques
Konrad Pisera
Chapter 6
Prospects of the urban housing market in Spain
Michał Reszel
Chapter 7
Inequality impact on social security. Overlapping generations models with the political dimension
Mateusz Krząkała
Chapter 8
Impact of online fantasy sports leagues on the engagement of fans
Sebastian Muraszewski
Chapter 9
Burnout and turnover of healthcare professionals in selected countries
in the COVID-19 pandemic
Dagmara Ruszkiewicz
Chapter 10
Institutional determinants of the state response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Julian Smółka
Opinie
Radosław Malik
This scientific monograph is a collection of ten texts written by students of the SGH Warsaw School of Economics, participants of the fourth edition of the Young Scientist programme.
The programme aims at a scientific development of talented young people who, during their bachelor and master studies evinced scientific interests and willingness to develop competences important in research work.
The texts included in the monograph concern a variety of research topics, with the main focus on research in economics, management and finance. The complexity of the research topics
undertaken by the authors of the chapters and a number of novel perspectives on the researched themes indicate authors’ research curiosity and heralds the future scientific successes of these young researchers.
The substantive quality of the research performed by the authors of the chapters reflects the contribution of the Young Scientist programme of the SGH Warsaw School of Economics, which successfully advances students’ research competences.
The texts included in this monograph apply Systematic Literature Review (SLR) as a primary research method. A systematic literature review is an essential aspect of scientific research that provides a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence
on a particular research question and is broadly used in various fields. There are variety of benefits of SLR that have established it as a valid research method and justified its application for the purpose of this monograph.
However, among all of its advantages, clarity and reliability clearly stand out as crucial characteristics of SLR. First, systematic literature reviews are viewed as important tools to improve clarity of the previous research
as they support researchers in synthesising the findings of multiple studies and provide a coherent and explicit account of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. Thus, SLR enables researchers to identify
gaps in the literature and undertake well-informed decisions about direction of future research. Second, systematic literature reviews increase reliability of the results as they follow rigorous and transparent research procedures.
Therefore, SLR reinforces the research capacity to identify biases and limitations in individual studies, and also facilitates valid conclusions based on the available evidence.
The systematic literature reviews collected for the purpose of this monograph use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol in order to further strengthen the quality of the research
and enhance the insight into the research topics selected by the authors.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) is a set of guidelines for conducting and reporting systematic literature reviews that, as an analytical tool, originates from life science research
and is broadly used in e.g. medical research. The use of PRISMA provide several benefits to scientific research also in social sciences, which include improved research rigour, increased transparency and enhanced comparability.
These advantages supported the use of PRISMA in the research prepared for the purpose of this monograph.
The application of PRISMA protocol provides a structured framework for conducting SLRs, which helps to ensure that the research processes in this monograph are rigorous and standardised.
As PRISMA enforces a standardised approach to conducting and reporting SLRs, it ensures that crucial aspects of the SLR application, such as searching for studies, selecting studies, and synthesising the results, are carried out
in a consistent and streamlined manner, thus, increasing the transparency of the research process. Therefore, the application of PRISMA leads to enhanced comparability, as it allows to analyse the results of different reviews
more efficiently, which helps to build a more comprehensive and robust evidence base on a particular topic. Overall, the utilisation of the PRISMA protocol can be viewed as a good practice for
conducting systematic literature reviews also in economics as well as management and finance research as it elevates the quality of the SLR and boosts the validity of the results.
Table of Contents
Preface
Radosław Malik
Chapter 1
Reasons for volatility of the green bond market
Agata Aftowicz
Chapter 2
Ethics and implementation of nudge policy
Wojciech Godlewski
Chapter 3
Negative effects of venture capital on startup innovation
Patryk Jóźwiak
Chapter 4
Between dynamics and equilibrium. An evolutionary perspective on firms
Jakub Konończuk
Chapter 5
Determinants of foreign direct investment acquired with Bayesian statistical techniques
Konrad Pisera
Chapter 6
Prospects of the urban housing market in Spain
Michał Reszel
Chapter 7
Inequality impact on social security. Overlapping generations models with the political dimension
Mateusz Krząkała
Chapter 8
Impact of online fantasy sports leagues on the engagement of fans
Sebastian Muraszewski
Chapter 9
Burnout and turnover of healthcare professionals in selected countries
in the COVID-19 pandemic
Dagmara Ruszkiewicz
Chapter 10
Institutional determinants of the state response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Julian Smółka
